View the article’s original source
We learned a few days ago that Connecticut will require all juniors to take the SAT instead of the Smarter Balanced Assessments. This is a solution to the problem that most students fail the SBA, and that creates a dilemma: what will the state do with the majority of students who won’t graduate? The SAT doesn’t have a passing mark, no one “fails,” and schools can really use multiple measures.
States will replace PARCC or Smarter Balanced with the SAT because:
1) David Coleman is president of the College Board (salary: $750,000), and he aligned the SAT with Common Core. So, no difference.
2) More than 800 colleges and universities no longer require the SAT, which is a threat to its income.
3) if more and more states require all juniors to take the SAT, it is a huge bonanza for the College Board.
SAT scores are closely correlated with family income, so states will get a close measure of affluence and poverty.
Researchers have. found that high school Grade Point Average and course taking were better predictors of college success than the one-shot SAT. That’s why many colleges have become test-optional.
Question: when did the SAT become a measure of career readiness?